Real-time fraud detection
Use expanded analytics to flag risky patterns earlier and more consistently.
Deep diveCampaign platform
Four practical priorities focused on earlier risk detection, accessible public data, simpler reporting and resilient systems.
The four pillars
The priorities below are adapted from the campaign’s published platform and endorsement address.
Use expanded analytics to flag risky patterns earlier and more consistently.
Deep diveMake public financial information easier to explore through dashboards and maps.
Deep diveReduce duplicative manual reporting and help local governments submit information faster.
Deep diveProtect public information with monitoring, access controls, encryption, alerts and training.
Deep diveDeeper dive
The State Auditor cannot freeze payments, but the office can identify problems before they grow. The campaign proposes expanding the use of tools such as Power BI and other analytics to flag potentially risky spending in local governments earlier and more consistently.
Confirmed concerns would then be referred promptly to the authorities with the power to act.
Transparency should not require a records request. The campaign proposes complementing static reports with interactive dashboards built using tools such as Python, R or Tableau, along with geospatial maps through Esri.
The stated goal is to help residents, researchers and journalists follow how tax dollars move through counties, cities, school districts and other public entities.
Outdated paperwork can slow audits and burden local staff. The campaign proposes shared data frameworks, clearer submission processes and a risk-based approach that focuses attention where it is most useful.
The intended result is fewer duplicative forms, faster audits and more time for local officials to focus on public services.
Working with Minnesota IT Services, the campaign proposes continuous monitoring, intrusion detection, encrypted storage and real-time alerts, backed by regular staff training and strict access controls.
The objective is to protect public information and reduce the likelihood that a preventable security weakness becomes a breach.
Operational concept
Receive consistent, secure financial reporting from local entities.
Use risk indicators and professional judgment to prioritize review.
Perform the office’s lawful oversight work and refer confirmed concerns.
Provide accessible reports and dashboards without exposing protected data.
Platform FAQ
No. The campaign’s published platform acknowledges that the office cannot simply freeze payments. Its proposal is to identify risks earlier, verify concerns through proper oversight and refer confirmed issues to the appropriate authorities.
The Office of the State Auditor’s current primary focus is local-government financial activity. The Office of the Legislative Auditor has separate responsibilities for state agencies. Any description of authority should be kept aligned with current Minnesota law.
They should not. Public reporting must follow applicable data practices, privacy, security and records laws. The platform pairs broader access with strict access controls and cybersecurity.
It means using consistent indicators to help prioritize limited audit attention while still applying professional standards and legal requirements. Analytics can guide review; they do not replace human judgment.
Read next
The campaign’s stated commitments are organized around seven service values.